I am lucky enough to know quite a lot about the court of the Tudors, because I have watched “The Tudors”, an English TV show that despite being inaccurate at times gives an idea of the major characters at stake. I have also read a book recently about the “marital problems” of King Henry (“The Six Wives of Henry VIII” by Antonia Fraser). I find the Tudors one of the most fascinating dynasties in history and for sure it is the most engaging soap-opera I have ever seen. If you don’t know much about the people buzzing around King Henry at the time, I think you’ll struggle a bit with this novel. Henry’s best friend Charles Brandon whom he made duke, the powerful Cardinal Wolsey with his ambition to be Pope, the Boleyns, the Seymours and the Howards, Katherine and her ladies-in-waiting, the ambassadors, Thomas More, they all appear in the book and play their role in the development of the story. Nonetheless, Thomas Cromwell is the absolute protagonist of “Wolf Hall”: everything is seen from his point of view, despite the fact that the novel is in the third person. Usually Thomas Cromwell is depicted as a stone-cold and shrewd person, almost a villain, but Hilary Mantel depicts him as a sensitive person, fond of his family and of his protector, the Cardinal. Of course he’s ambitious and I dare say on the good side of shrewdness, if there is one. He’s learned, almost enlightened, he appreciates Italian painting and has a gift for languages. I was delighted by this book and by the world it opens on: Thomas Cromwell is not just a name on a history book, but he steps into the real world. He has passions, faults, virtues of course, doubts and secrets. And so is King Henry, Mary and Anne Boleyn, Thomas More and all the historical characters of the book. I’m waiting for the sequel that Hilary Mantel is writing (the book ends abruptly when King Henry is about to stop by the Seymour and fall in love with Jane, later to become his third wife). Much has been said about “Wolf Hall” since it won the Booker Prize, for example on the meaning of the expression “historical fiction”. It is obvious that Hilary Mantel did a lot of research to write this book, but it’s impossible for a book set in the 16th century to be 100% accurate, not only because it would ruin the literary value of the work, but also because there are many things we don’t know or we are not sure of. Were Mary Boleyn’s children actually the king’s? Did he also sleep with Anne and Mary’s mother? Did Anne make love to distinguished courtier-poet Thomas Wyatt and was she betrothed to Henry Percy, before she became the king’s mistress? Hilary Mantel resolves this by hinting at things we are not sure of as gossips of the time, but even if she changed things, I personally believe that’s alright, as long as you claim yours is just fiction.
A blog about books from all around the world, with an emphasis on everything postcolonial.
Sunday, October 10, 2010
"Wolf Hall" by Hilary Mantel
I am lucky enough to know quite a lot about the court of the Tudors, because I have watched “The Tudors”, an English TV show that despite being inaccurate at times gives an idea of the major characters at stake. I have also read a book recently about the “marital problems” of King Henry (“The Six Wives of Henry VIII” by Antonia Fraser). I find the Tudors one of the most fascinating dynasties in history and for sure it is the most engaging soap-opera I have ever seen. If you don’t know much about the people buzzing around King Henry at the time, I think you’ll struggle a bit with this novel. Henry’s best friend Charles Brandon whom he made duke, the powerful Cardinal Wolsey with his ambition to be Pope, the Boleyns, the Seymours and the Howards, Katherine and her ladies-in-waiting, the ambassadors, Thomas More, they all appear in the book and play their role in the development of the story. Nonetheless, Thomas Cromwell is the absolute protagonist of “Wolf Hall”: everything is seen from his point of view, despite the fact that the novel is in the third person. Usually Thomas Cromwell is depicted as a stone-cold and shrewd person, almost a villain, but Hilary Mantel depicts him as a sensitive person, fond of his family and of his protector, the Cardinal. Of course he’s ambitious and I dare say on the good side of shrewdness, if there is one. He’s learned, almost enlightened, he appreciates Italian painting and has a gift for languages. I was delighted by this book and by the world it opens on: Thomas Cromwell is not just a name on a history book, but he steps into the real world. He has passions, faults, virtues of course, doubts and secrets. And so is King Henry, Mary and Anne Boleyn, Thomas More and all the historical characters of the book. I’m waiting for the sequel that Hilary Mantel is writing (the book ends abruptly when King Henry is about to stop by the Seymour and fall in love with Jane, later to become his third wife). Much has been said about “Wolf Hall” since it won the Booker Prize, for example on the meaning of the expression “historical fiction”. It is obvious that Hilary Mantel did a lot of research to write this book, but it’s impossible for a book set in the 16th century to be 100% accurate, not only because it would ruin the literary value of the work, but also because there are many things we don’t know or we are not sure of. Were Mary Boleyn’s children actually the king’s? Did he also sleep with Anne and Mary’s mother? Did Anne make love to distinguished courtier-poet Thomas Wyatt and was she betrothed to Henry Percy, before she became the king’s mistress? Hilary Mantel resolves this by hinting at things we are not sure of as gossips of the time, but even if she changed things, I personally believe that’s alright, as long as you claim yours is just fiction.
Thursday, October 8, 2009
Hilary Mantel wins Man Booker Prize 2009
No surprise, it was this year’s favourite. She has beaten excellent writers such as A.S. Byatt and J.M. Coetzee (the favourite in my poll!).
I have never read a novel by Hilary Mantel and I didn’t know her name before reading about her nomination, but apparently she has written ten novels before this one. It’s sad when an author is awarded such an important prize and you had never heard of her/him or read one of his/her books. Wait for the next post on the Nobel Prize for Literature and you'll have the same reaction you had last year: uh?
By the way,
Wednesday, September 9, 2009
Booker Prize Shortlist 2009
It deals with intertwined lives of four families at the turn of the 20th century as they experiment with bohemian living, each with their own secrets.
This book completes his trilogy of fictionalised memoir begun with Boyhood and Youth, detailing the story of a young English biographer who is writing a book about the late author John Coetzee. Coetzee has already won the Booker Prize twice (for Life and Times of Michael K and Disgrace) and he would be the first author to win for the third time.
A historical reconstruction of the meeting of the poets John Clare and Alfred Tennyson at a lunatic asylum in Epping Forest.
Hilary Mantel – Wolf Hall
A piece of historical fiction centring on Thomas Cromwell, who was the successor to Cardinal Wolsey as Henry VIII’s most trusted adviser as the king tries to divorce Catherine of Aragon and marry Anne Boleyn. She’s the favourite, according to the critic, the bloggers and the odds (English people love betting on everything, didn’t you know?).
Simon Mawer – The Glass Room
An historical novel set in Czechoslovakia in the late 1930s. As war looms, newlyweds Viktor and Liesel Landauer, a Jew married to a gentile, move to a house on a hill with a unique glass room.
Sarah Waters – The Little Strangers
A ghost story set in post-war, rural Warwickshire. She’s the favourite at the tills!
- Jonathan Ruppin of Independent book chain Foyles says: “It's noticeable that this year the majority of writers in contention all have a few books to their names already, which perhaps underlines the fact that most outstanding authors are like vintage wines, developing a fuller, richer appeal as their careers progress”. No flash in the pan, then! Arifa Akbar of The Independent also notes that “The shortlist was very different from last year’s selection which included two debut novelists, one of whom, Aravind Adiga, won with The White Tiger”.
- Another commentator, in an audio interview , notes that all the titles, with the exception of Coetzee’s novel, are historical fiction, what the Germans would call “faction” (!). Erica Wagner of The Times tries to explain why in this article.
- The surprise is maybe that Tolm Cóibín’s Brooklyn didn’t make it to the shortlist (it’s the only book I saw in translation in Italian bookshops so far and I was tempted to buy it) and William Trevor neither. Also, I take note that those have been shortlisted but never won are called “bridesmaids” (at least in some articles of The Guardian), because they always attend the wedding but they are never the spouse. Isn’t it a slightly cruel nickname?
- Jim Naughtie (what a surname!), a BBC broadcaster and this year chair of the judges, said that there were quite a few bad books among the big names that entered the prize. "Just because you are an accomplished writer with a great reputation it does not mean you can't write a bad book”. People exluded from the Booker race this year: John Banville, Thomas Keneally, Anita Brookner, Penelope Lively, Kazuo Ishiguro and Margaret Atwood (according to the article). So at least one of these has written a bad book this year!
More to come on the Not the Booker prize, remember what a journalist said about the books on the Booker shortlist? They're always about postcolonial guilt (not this year, babe), Irish famine (nope) or English middle-class Islingtonians having Terribly Important Thoughts about their boring love lives (are they?).
Thursday, July 30, 2009
Man Booker Prize 2009 - Longlist
A.S. Byatt – The Children’s Book (UK)
J.M. Coetzee – Summertime (South Africa / Australia)
Adam Foulds – The Quickening Maze (UK)
Sarah Hall – How to Paint a Dead Man (UK)
Samantha Harvey – The Wilderness (UK)
James Lever – Me Cheeta (UK)
Hilary Mantel – Wolf Hall (UK)
Simon Mawer – The Glass Room (UK)
Ed O’Loughlin – Not Untrue & Not Unkind (Ireland)
James Scudamore – Heliopolis (UK)
Colm Toibin – Brooklyn (Ireland)
William Trevor – Love and Summer (Ireland)
Sarah Waters – The Little Strangers (UK)
Tuesday, October 14, 2008
Aravind Adiga wins Man Booker Prize 2008
Those who placed their bets on Sebastian Barry's "The Secret Scripture" or Amitav Ghosh's "Sea of Poppies" (another Indian novel!) must be surprised.
C'mon Desi Lit!
All in all, I'm happy because it was one of the novels I really wanted to read. Now it will be quite difficult to get a copy from the local library, anyway...
MORE TO COME ON THE BOOKER PRIZE...
Tuesday, September 9, 2008
Man Booker Prize Shortlist 2008
- The White Tiger by Aravind Adiga (India)
- The Secret Scripture by Sebastian Barry (Ireland)
- Sea of Poppies by Amitav Ghosh (India)
- The Clothes on Their Backs by Linda Grant (UK)
- The Northern Clemency by Philip Hensher (UK)
- A Fraction of the Whole by Steve Toltz (Australia)
Most of the books I thought could enter my autumn reading list didn't make it. The other titles were Girl in a Blue Dress by Gaynor Arnold (UK), From A to X by John Berger (UK), The Lost Dog by Michelle de Kretser (Australia / Sri Lanka), A Case of Exploding Mangoes by Mohammed Hanif (Pakistan), Netherland by Joseph O'Neill (Ireland), The Enchantress of Florence by Salman Rushdie (India / UK) and Child 44 by Tom Rob Smith (UK).
Ugh, great mystery this Booker Prize. I think I'll read Mohammed Hanif's A Case of Exploding Mangoes no matter what and I'll add Steve Toltz to my previous list.
Ahah, Jonathan Jones of The Guardian amusingly found out why Salman Bloody Rushdie didn't make the shortlist. Apparently, he messed up with polenta! This is going to be hilarious... So you know that Mr Rushdie is always trying to be funny in his novels... Well, in The Enchantress of Florence he imagines young Niccolò Machiavelli and his friends improvising a song about polenta (!). Only polenta is made with maize, which is an American crop that was brought to Europe only after Columbus reached the Americas, and the scene is set in the early 1480s! A journalist promised to spice up the book with some curry and eat it if Rushdie didn't win the Booker this year, so take that... Eat some polenta, instead! Read the article here.
Wednesday, July 30, 2008
Man Booker Prize Longlist 2008
- The White Tiger by Aravind Adiga (India): Indian stories are always appealing these days;
- Girl in a Blue Dress by Gaynor Arnold (UK)
- The Secret Scripture by Sebastian Barry (Ireland)
- From A to X by John Berger (UK): it hasn’t been published yet, but it looks tempting;
- The Lost Dog by Michelle de Kretser (Australia / Sri Lanka): already on ‘The Guardian’’s reading list, the buzz of the year;
- Sea of Poppies by Amitav Ghosh (India)
- The Clothes on Their Backs by Linda Grant (UK): London Jewish family in the 1970s, interesting;
- A Case of Exploding Mangoes by Mohammad Hanif (Pakistan): quirkily interesting;
- The Northern Clemency by Philip Hensher (UK)
- Netherland by Joseph O'Neill (Ireland): 9/11 novel set in the USA;
- The Enchantress of Florence by Salman Rushdie (India / UK): I swear I’m not gonna read this before Midnight’s Children, plus I’m beginning to be a bit fed up with Mr Rushdie. He’s everywhere!
- Child 44 by Tom Rob Smith (UK)
- A Fraction of the Whole by Steve Toltz (Australia)
Thursday, July 10, 2008
"Midnight’s Children" wins Best of the Booker
